TYPE B AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA – WHEN A SHEEP BECOMES A WOLF

Authors

  • Nuno Henriques Coelho Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Clara Nogueira Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Victor Martins Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Jacinta Campos Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Andreia Coelho Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Rita Augusto Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Evelise Pinto Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Carolina Semião Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • João Ribeiro Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • João Peixoto Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal
  • Alexandra Canedo Serviço de Angiologia e Cirurgia Vascular, Centro Hospitalar Vila Nova de Gaia/Espinho, Portugal

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.245

Keywords:

Acute aortic syndromes, Intramural hematoma, Penetrating aortic ulcer, TEVAR

Abstract

Introduction: Type B aortic intramural hematoma (B-IMH) has a complex and variable natural history: it can remain stable and resolve spontaneously or progress to dissection, aneurysm, ulcer or even rupture. The possibility of disease progression, frequently with mild or no symptomatology, poses a significant treatment dilemma.


Clinical Case: We report a case of a 60 year-old-female diagnosed with an acute B-IMH, initially treated medically. However, 1-month control CTA revealed disease progression (increased B-IMH thickness and evolution to an ulcer-like-projection with 20 mm diameter and 11 mm depth). She was submitted to a left carotid-subclavian bypass followed by TEVAR and left-subclavian ostial embolization. During follow-up (5 months) patient remain asymptomatic, demonstrating favorable aortic remodeling.


Conclusion: Type B-IMH is a dynamic pathology. From presentation to late follow-up, patients remain at high risk for abrupt catastrophic complications. As reported, TEVAR seems to be a safe and effective approach in the event of unfavorable evolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Committee, W. et al. Editor ' s Choice e Management of Descending Thoracic Aorta Diseases Clinical Practice Guidelines of the European
Society for Vascular Surgery ( ESVS ). 4–52 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.06.005

2. Maslow, A., Atalay, M. K. & Sodha, N. Intramural Hematoma. J. Cardiothorac. Vasc. Anesth. 1–22 (2018). doi:10.1053/j.jvca.2018.01.025

3. Moral, S., Avegliano, G., Ballesteros, E., Salcedo, M. T. & Evangelista, A. Clinical Implications of Focal Intimal Disruption in Patients With Type B Intramural Hematoma. J Am Coll Cardiol. 69, 28–39 (2017).

4. Ferrera, C. et al. Evolution and prognosis of intramural aortic hematoma. Insights from a midterm cohort study. Int. J. Cardiol. 249, 410–413 (2017).

5. Ferrera, C. et al. Evolution and prognosis of intramural aortic hematoma. Insights from a midterm cohort study. Int. J. Cardiol. 1–4 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.09.170

6. Muntanyà, X. et al. Predictive value of small ulcers in the evolution of acute type B intramural hematoma. Eur. J. Radiol. 81, 1569–1574 (2011).

7. Elefteriades, J. A. et al. Long-term behavior of aortic intramural hematomas and penetrating ulcers. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 151, 361-373.e1 (2015).

8. Pi"aretti, G. et al. Best Medical Treatment and Selective Stent-GraftRepair for Acute Type B Aortic Intramural Hematoma. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 30, 279–287 (2018).

9. Tenorio, E. R. & Sandri, G. A. Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and Intramural Hematoma. Cardiovasc Interv. Radiol. 42(3), 321–334 (2019).

10. Nauta, Foeke; Kamman, Arnoud; Trimarchi, S. Penetrating Aortic Ulcer and Intramural Hematoma. Endovasc. Today 87–91 (2014).

11. Evangelista, A., Czerny, M., Nienaber, C., Schepens, M. & Rousseau, H. Interdisciplinary expert consensus on management of type B intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 47, 209–217 (2015).

12. Schlatter, T. et al. Type B intramural hematoma of the aorta: Evolution and prognostic value of intimal erosion. J. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 22, 533–541 (2011).

13. Goldberg, J. B., Kim, J. B. & Sundt, T. M. Current understandings and approach to the management of aortic intramural hematomas. Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 26, 123–131 (2014).

14. Bosma, M. S. et al. Ulcer-like Projections Developing in Noncommunicating Aortic Dissections: CT Findings and Natural History. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 895–905 (2009).

Downloads

Published

2020-02-07

How to Cite

1.
Coelho NH, Nogueira C, Martins V, Campos J, Coelho A, Augusto R, Pinto E, Semião C, Ribeiro J, Peixoto J, Canedo A. TYPE B AORTIC INTRAMURAL HEMATOMA – WHEN A SHEEP BECOMES A WOLF. Angiol Cir Vasc [Internet]. 2020 Feb. 7 [cited 2024 Mar. 29];15(4):269-72. Available from: https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/245

Issue

Section

Clinical Case