Spinal cord ischaemia predictors and outcomes in complex endovascular aortic repair – a single centre retrospective study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.678

Keywords:

Spinal cord ischemia, endovascular, complex abdominal aortic aneurysm, thoraco-abdominal aortic aneurysm, cerebrospinal fluid drainage

Abstract

Introduction

Spinal cord ischemia (SCI) is an infrequent distressing complication following thoraco-abdominal (TAAA) and complex abdominal aortic aneurysm (CAAA) repair. Prior studies showed controversial results regarding risk factors and preventive measures. We aim to analyze the incidence of SCI after endovascular treatment of complex aortic aneurysms in our center and perform a descriptive analysis.

 

Methods

Single-center retrospective study conducted in a tertiary care center including all patients with a TAAA or CAAA who underwent endovascular repair using a fenestrated/branched endograft from June 2010 to February 2025. Patient characteristics, peri-procedural and follow-up data were obtained. SCI was defined according to the Society for Vascular Surgery reporting standards as new-onset motor or sensitive deficits after endovascular treatment.

 

Results

145 patients (91% male, mean age 71±6 years) were included, of which 59 (41%) had degenerative TAAAs (types I-V) and 57 (39%) CAAAs. Mean aneurysm diameter was 66±14mm. A prophylactic cerebrospinal fluid drainage (CSFD) was preoperatively placed in 61 patients (42%). Total incidence of SCI was 8% (12/145): minimal sensory deficits in 33% (4/12), paraparesis in 8% (1/12) and paraplegia in 59% (7/12). Most patients (83%, 10/12) presented with delayed SCI. After symptom onset, 58% of patients (n=7) required rescue CSFD. Regarding patients with grade 3 SCI (n=7), a complete recovery was observed in 3 patients, 1 patient experienced partial recovery and 3 did not recover. No differences concerning prior aortic surgery, internal iliac artery patency, procedural staging or preoperative CSFD placement were found between SCI and no-SCI patients.

 

Conclusion

In this study, SCI manifested mostly as a delayed event. Prophylactic CSFD may prevent permanent injury. The small sample size could hinder the investigation of more robust findings. Despite several risk factors and preventive measures having been identified, the best preventive approach is still lacking. Further studies are required to prevent this devastating complication.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aucoin VJ, Motyl CM, Novak Z, Eagleton MJ, Farber MA, Gasper W, et al. Predictors and outcomes of spinal cord injury following complex branched/fenestrated endovascular aortic repair in the USAortic Research Consortium. J Vasc Surg. 2023;77:1578-87.

Locatelli F, Nana P, Houérou TL, Guirimand A, Nader M, Gaudin A, et al. Spinal cord ischemia rates and prophylactic spinal drainage in patients treated with fenestrated/branched endovascular repair for thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2023;78:883-91.

Aucoin VJ, Bolaji B, Novak Z, Spangler EL, Sutzko DC, McFarland GE, et al. Trends in the use of cerebrospinal drains and outcomes related to spinal cord ischemia after thoracic endovascular aortic repair and complex endovascular aortic repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative database. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74:1067-78.

Heidemann F, Köbler T, Kuchenbecker J, Kreutzburg T, Debus ES, LarenaAvellaneda A, et al. Incidence, predictors, and outcomes of spinal cord ischemia in elective complex endovascular aortic repair: An analysis of health insurance claims. J Vasc Surg. 2020;72:837-48.

Miranda V, Sousa J, Mansilha A. Spinal cord injury in endovascular thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair: prevalence, risk factors and preventive strategies. Int Angiol. 2018;37:112-26.

Spanos K, Köbler T, Kubitz JC, Wipper S, Konstantinou N, Heidemann F, et al. Risk of spinal cord ischemia after fenestrated or branched endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;69:357-66.

Wanhainen A, Van Herzeele I, Goncalves FB, Montoya SB, Berard X, Boyle JR, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2024 Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery Aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;67:192-331.

Oderich GS, Forbes TL, Chaer R, Davies MG, Lindsay TF, Mastracci T, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic repair of aneurysms involving the renal-mesenteric arteries. J Vasc Surg. 2020;73:45-525.

Kelly H, Herman D, Loo K, Narangoli A, Watson E, Berlant C, et al. Recognition of significantly delayed spinal cord ischemia following thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A case report and review of the literature. Cureus. 2024;16: e51522.

Baba T, Ohki T, Kanaoka Y, Maeda K, Ohta H, Fukushima S, et al. Clinical Outcomes of Spinal Cord Ischemia after Fenestrated and Branched Endovascular Stent Grafting during Total Endovascular Aortic Repair for Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;44:146-57.

Rosvall L, Karelis A, Sonesson B, Dias NV. A dedicated preventive protocol sustainably avoids spinal cord ischemia after endovascular aortic repair. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024;1440674.

Pini R, Faggioli G, Paraskevas KI, Alaidroos M, Palermo S, Gallitto E, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the occurrence of spinal cord ischemia after endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2021;75:1466-77.

Downloads

Published

2026-03-09

How to Cite

1.
Gueifão I, Alves G, Quintas A, Cardoso J, Fidalgo H, Figueiredo A, et al. Spinal cord ischaemia predictors and outcomes in complex endovascular aortic repair – a single centre retrospective study. Angiol Cir Vasc [Internet]. 2026 Mar. 9 [cited 2026 Mar. 9];21(4):163-70. Available from: https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/678

Issue

Section

Original Article

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.