SPLENIC ARTERY ANEURYSM — FOLLOW UP ON TWO CASES OF ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT TREATMENT

Authors

  • A. Coelho Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • M. Lobo Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • C. Nogueira Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • D. Brandão Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • R. Gouveia Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • P. Sousa Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • J. Campos Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • R. Augusto Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • N. Coelho Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho
  • A. Canedo Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia e Espinho

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.43

Keywords:

Splenic artery aneurysm, Splanchnic aneurysm, Endovascular treatment, Follow-up

Abstract

Splenic artery aneurysms are rare, but constitute nearly 60% of all visceral arterial aneurysms. Most patients (80%) are asymptomatic and diagnosed incidentally. Rupture risk is estimated in 3%–10%, with a mortality rate of 25—70%. Elective treatment criteria include symptomatic patients, aneurysms larger than 2 cm in diameter or with rapid enlargement and aneurysms of any size diagnosed in patients with portal hypertension or women of childbearing age; Endovascular treatment is first line of treatment in patients with splenic artery aneurysms, and include several options such as coil embolization, detachable balloon occlusion and stent graft placement. The latter is more suitable for proximally located aneurysms and its main advantage is the potential to preserve splenic blood flow and splenic function. It is noteworthy that stent graft placement to treat splenic artery aneurysms is rarely described in the literature with the largest series having 10 cases, and can be technically challenging due to splenic artery tortuosity. There are no long term results in the literature. In this paper we describe two cases of splenic artery aneurysm repair using stent grafts, with a maximum follow-up of 8 years. We achieved technical success in both cases, with no post-procedure growth, endoleak, kinking, migration re-intervention or other complications. As a conclusion, there is paucity of data on the use of stent grafts in splenic artery aneurysms, however our single center small series results are encouraging with a considerable follow-up period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Karaman K, Onat L, Sirvanci M. Endovascular stent graft treatment
in a patient with splenic artery aneurysm. Diagn Interv
Radiol. 2005; 11:119–121.
2. Popov P BSSD. Treatment of visceral artery aneurysms:retrospective
study of 35 cases. Vasa. 2007; 36(3):191–8.
3. Akbulut S, Otan E. Management of Giant Splenic Artery Aneurysm:
Comprehensive Literature Review. Medicine. 2015; 94(27):e1016.
4. Hogendoorn W LAHM. Cost-effectiveness of endovascular repair,
open repair, and conservative management of splenic artery
aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 61(6):1432—40.
5. Hogendoorn W LAHM. Open repair, endovascular repair, and
conservative management of true splenic artery aneurysms.. J
Vasc Surg. 2014; 60(6):1667–76.e1.
6. Sticco A, Aggarwal A, Shapiro M. A comparison of open and endovascular
treatment strategies for the management of splenic
artery aneurysms. Vascular. 2015; 0(0) 1–5.
7. Reed NR OGMJ. Feasibility of endovascular repair of splenic artery
aneurysms using stent graft. J Vasc Surg. 2015; 62:1504–10.
8. Gabelmann A GJME. Endovascular treatment of visceral artery
aneurysms. J Endovasc Ther. 2002; 9:38–47.

Published

2017-12-30

How to Cite

1.
Coelho A, Lobo M, Nogueira C, Brandão D, Gouveia R, Sousa P, Campos J, Augusto R, Coelho N, Canedo A. SPLENIC ARTERY ANEURYSM — FOLLOW UP ON TWO CASES OF ENDOVASCULAR STENT GRAFT TREATMENT. Angiol Cir Vasc [Internet]. 2017 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Apr. 24];13(4):38-41. Available from: https://acvjournal.com/index.php/acv/article/view/43

Issue

Section

Clinical Case