MORPHOLOGIC CHANGES AND CLINICAL CONSEQUENCES OF WIDE AAA NECKS TREATED WITH 34-36MM PROXIMAL DIAMETER EVAR DEVICES

  • José Oliveira-Pinto Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Oporto, Porto, Portugal. 
  • Rita Soares Ferreira Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Nélson F. G. Oliveira Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital do Divino Espírito Santo, Ponta Delgada, Azores, Portugal
  • Frederico Bastos Gonçalves Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Hospital de Santa Marta, Centro Hospitalar de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Lisbon, Portugal
  • Sanne Hoeks Department of Anesthesiology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
  • Marie Josee Van Rijn Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Sander Ten Raa Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Armando Mansilha Department of Angiology and Vascular Surgery, Centro Hospitalar São João, Porto, Portugal; Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of Oporto, Porto, Portugal
  • Hence Verhagen Department of Vascular Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Keywords: Aortic aneurysm, Abdominal (MeSH), Aneurysm, Aortic neck, Neck Diameter, Neck-related events

Abstract

Introduction: Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) became the preferred modality for infrarenal aneurysm (AAA) repair. Several available endografts have main body proximal diameters up to 36mm, allowing for treatment of proximal AAA necks up to 32 mm. However, large neck represents a predictor of proximal complications after EVAR. The purpose of this study is to evaluate mid-term outcomes of patients requiring 34-36mm main body devices.

Methods: Retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database including all patients undergoing elective EVAR for degenerative AAA in a single tertiary referral hospital in The Netherlands were eligible. All measurements were performed on center-lumen line reconstructions obtained on dedicated software. Patients were classified as large diameter (LD) if the implanted device was >32mm wide. The remaining patients were classified as normal diameter (ND). Primary endpoint was neck-related events (a composite of “endoleak” (EL) 1A, neck-related secondary intervention or migration >5mm). Neck morphology changes and survival were also assessed. Differences in groups were adjusted by multivariable analysis.

Results: The study included 502 patients (90 in the LD group; 412 in the ND group). Median follow-up was 3.5 years (1.5–6.2) and 4.5 years (2.1–7.3) for the LD and ND groups, respectively (P = .008). Regarding baseline characteristics, hypertension (83% vs 69.7%, P=.012) and smoking (86% vs 74.1%, P=.018) were more frequent in the LD group. Patients in the LD group had wider (Proximal neck Ø > 28 mm: 75% vs 3.3%, P<.001), more angulated (α-angle>45º: 21% vs 9%, P=.002), more conical (39.8% vs 20.3%, P<.001) and a thrombus-laden neck (Neck thrombus >25%: 42% vs 32.3%, P<.089). Oversizing was greater among LD group (20% [12.5–28.8] vs 16.7% [12–21.7], P=.008). All other anatomical risk factors were similar between groups. The 5-year freedom from neck-related event was 73% for the LD group and 85% for the ND group, P=.001. Type 1A endoleaks were more common in the LD group (12.2% vs 5.1%, P=.003). Migration > 5mm occurred similarly in both groups (7.8% vs 5.1%, P=.32). Neck-related secondary interventions were also more common among LD patients (13.3% vs 8.7%; P = .027). On multivariable regression analysis, LD group was an independent risk factor for neck-related adverse events (Hazard Ratio [HR]: 2.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.37–3.83, P=0.002). Neck dilatation was greater among LD patients (median, 3 mm [IQR, 0–6] vs 2mm [IQR, 0–4]; P =.034) On multivariable analysis, LD was an independent predictor for neck dilatation > 10 % (HR: 1.61 CI 95% 1.08–2.39, P=.020). Survival at 5-years was 66.1% for LD and 71.2% for SD groups, P=.14.

Conclusion: Standard EVAR in patients with large infrarenal necks requiring a 34- to 36-mm proximal endograft is independently associated to increased rate of neck related events and more neck dilatation. This subgroup of patients could be considered for more proximal seal strategies with fenestrated or branched devices, if unfit for open repair. Tighter surveillance following EVAR in these patients in the long term is also advised.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Schermerhorn ML, Buck DB, Curran T, et al. Long-Term Outcomes and
Temporal Trends With Endovascular vs Open Repair of Abdominal
Aortic Aneurysms in the Medicare Population†. Journal of vascular
surgery 2014;60:830.
2. Antoniou GA, Georgiadis GS, Antoniou SA, Kuhan G, Murray D.
A meta-analysis of outcomes of endovascular abdominal aortic
aneurysm repair in patients with hostile and friendly neck anatomy.
Journal of vascular surgery 2013;57:527-38.
3. Oliveira NFG, Bastos Gonçalves FM, Van Rijn MJ, et al. Standard endovascular
aneurysm repair in patients with wide infrarenal aneurysm
necks is associated with increased risk of adverse events. Journal of
vascular surgery 2017;65:1608-16.
4. Oliveira NFG, Gonçalves FB, Ultee K, et al. Patients with large neck
diameter have a higher risk of type IA endoleaks and aneurysm
rupture after standard endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of
vascular surgery 2019;69:783-91.
5. Balm R, Stokking R, Kaatee R, Blankensteijn JD, Eikelboom BC,
van Leeuwen MS. Computed tomographic angiographic imaging
of abdominal aortic aneurysms: implications for transfemoral
endovascular aneurysm management. Journal of vascular surgery
1997;26:231-7.
6. van Prehn J, van der Wal MB, Vincken K, Bartels LW, Moll FL, van
Herwaarden JA. Intra- and interobserver variability of aortic aneurysm
volume measurement with fast CTA postprocessing software.
Journal of endovascular therapy : an official journal of the International
Society of Endovascular Specialists 2008;15:504-10.
7. van Keulen JW, Moll FL, Tolenaar JL, Verhagen HJ, van Herwaarden JA.
Validation of a new standardized method to measure proximal aneurysm
neck angulation. Journal of vascular surgery 2010;51:821-8.
8. Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, et al. Reporting standards
for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular surgery
2002;35:1048-60.
9. Tadros RO, Faries PL, Ellozy SH, et al. The impact of stent graft evolution
on the results of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. Journal of vascular surgery 2014;59:1518-27.
10. Brewster DC, Jones JE, Chung TK, et al. Long-term outcomes after
endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: the first decade.
Annals of surgery 2006;244:426-38.
11. Broos PPHL, Stokmans RA, van Sterkenburg SMM, et al. Performance
of the Endurant stent graft in challenging anatomy.
Journal of vascular surgery 2015;62:312-8.
12. Howard DPJ, Marron CD, Sideso E, Puckridge PJ, Verhoeven ELG,
Spark JI. Editor's Choice - Influence of Proximal Aortic Neck Diameter
on Durability of Aneurysm Sealing and Overall Survival in Patients
Undergoing Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. Real World Data
from the Gore Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment
(GREAT). European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery :
the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
2018;56:189-99.
13. Bastos Goncalves F, Hoeks SE, Teijink JA, et al. Risk factors for
proximal neck complications after endovascular aneurysm repair
using the endurant stentgraft. European journal of vascular and
endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society
for Vascular Surgery 2015;49:156-62.
14. Schanzer A, Greenberg RK, Hevelone N, et al. Predictors of abdominal
aortic aneurysm sac enlargement after endovascular repair.
Circulation 2011;123:2848-55.
15. Gargiulo M, Gallitto E, Wattez H, et al. Outcomes of endovascular
aneurysm repair performed in abdominal aortic aneurysms with
large infrarenal necks. Journal of vascular surgery 2017;66:1065-72.
16. McFarland G, Tran K, Virgin-Downey W, et al. Infrarenal endovascular
aneurysm repair with large device (34- to 36-mm) diameters
is associated with higher risk of proximal fixation failure. Journal of
vascular surgery 2019;69:385-93.
17. Verhoeven BA, Waasdorp EJ, Gorrepati ML, et al. Long-term results
of Talent endografts for endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm
repair. Journal of vascular surgery 2011;53:293-8.
18. Melas N, Saratzis A, Saratzis N, et al. Aortic and iliac fixation of seven
endografts for abdominal-aortic aneurysm repair in an experimental
model using human cadaveric aortas. European journal
of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the
European Society for Vascular Surgery 2010;40:429-35.
19. Mastracci TM, Eagleton MJ, Kuramochi Y, Bathurst S, Wolski K.
Twelve-year results of fenestrated endografts for juxtarenal and
group IV thoracoabdominal aneurysms. Journal of vascular surgery
2015;61:355-64.
20. Goudeketting SR, van Noort K, Ouriel K, et al. Influence of aortic
neck characteristics on successful aortic wall penetration of Endo-
Anchors in therapeutic use during endovascular aneurysm repair.
Journal of vascular surgery 2018;68:1007-16.
21. Tassiopoulos AK, Monastiriotis S, Jordan WD, Muhs BE, Ouriel K,
De Vries JP. Predictors of early aortic neck dilatation after endovascular
aneurysm repair with EndoAnchors. Journal of vascular
surgery 2017;66:45-52.
22. Sampaio SM, Panneton JM, Mozes G, et al. Aortic Neck Dilation after
Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Should Oversizing
Be Blamed? Annals of vascular surgery 2006;20:338-45.
23. Diehm N, Di Santo S, Schaffner T, et al. Severe structural damage
of the seemingly non-diseased infrarenal aortic aneurysm neck.
Journal of vascular surgery 2008;48:425-34.
24. Falkensammer J, Oldenburg WA, Biebl M, et al. Abdominal aortic
aneurysm neck remodeling after open aneurysm repair. Journal of
vascular surgery 2007;45:900-5.
25. Oberhuber A, Buecken M, Hoffmann M, Orend K-H, Mühling BM.
Comparison of aortic neck dilatation after open and endovascular
repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. Journal of vascular surgery
2012;55:929-34.
26. Cao P, Verzini F, Parlani G, et al. Predictive factors and clinical
consequences of proximal aortic neck dilatation in 230 patients
undergoing abdominal aorta aneurysm repair with self-expandable
stent-grafts1 1Competition of interest: none. Journal of vascular
surgery 2003;37:1200-5.
27. Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, et al. Editor's Choice - European
Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 Clinical Practice
Guidelines on the Management of Abdominal Aorto-iliac Artery
Aneurysms. European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery :
the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery
2019;57:8-93.
28. Oliveira NFG, Ultee K, van Rijn MJ, et al. Anatomic predictors for late
mortality after standard endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of
vascular surgery 2019;69:1444-51.
29. Waasdorp EJ, de Vries JP, Hobo R, Leurs LJ, Buth J, Moll FL. Aneurysm
diameter and proximal aortic neck diameter influence clinical
outcome of endovascular abdominal aortic repair: a 4-year
EUROSTAR experience. Annals of vascular surgery 2005;19:755-61.
30. Bastos Goncalves F, van de Luijtgaarden KM, Hoeks SE, et al.
Adequate seal and no endoleak on the first postoperative computed
tomography angiography as criteria for no additional imaging up
to 5 years after endovascular aneurysm repair. Journal of vascular
surgery 2013;57:1503-11.
31. Oliveira-Pinto J, Ferreira RS, Oliveira NFG, et al. Total Luminal Volume
Predicts Risk after Endovascular Aneurysm Repair. European
Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery 2020.
Published
2020-08-05
Section
Original Article