Total endovascular aortic arch repair: a comprehensive review comparing parallel graft techniques and custom-made devices
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48750/acv.688Keywords:
Endovascular Aneurysm Repair (MeSH), Aorta, Thoracic (MeSH), Aortic Arch Syndromes (MeSH), Stroke (MeSH), Endoleak (MeSH)Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Endovascular approaches have emerged as promising alternatives for treating aortic arch pathology, particularly in high-risk patients. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of total endovascular aortic arch reconstruction, focusing on Parallel Graft Techniques (PGTs) and Custom-Made Devices (CMDs).
METHODS: PubMed and Scopus were searched to conduct a comprehensive review comparing the technical aspects, clinical outcomes, strengths, and limitations of PGTs and CMDs. Only studies reporting on total endovascular aortic aneurysm repair were considered. Studies with fewer than five patients, published in a language other than Portuguese, English, or Spanish, and reporting hybrid/open procedures or partial aortic arch reconstructions were excluded. Findings were summarised descriptively.
RESULTS: A total of 38 studies comprising 871 patients were included (214 in PGT and 657 in the CMD group). Technical success rates were high in both groups, mostly ranging from 80%80% to 100%100%. No clear superiority was observed between the two approaches for thirty-day, aorta-related, or overall mortality. However, stroke and spinal cord ischaemia (SCI) rates appeared higher in the CMD group, ranging from 0 to 42.9%42.9% and 0 to 9.1%9.1% respectively. The occurrence of type I and III endoleaks was higher in the PGT group (0-45.5% versus 0-32.4%), though this did not translate into a clear difference in reintervention rates. During follow-up, high target vessel patency rates were observed in both groups, typically exceeding 95%95% .
CONCLUSION: PGTs appear to have non-inferior outcomes in terms of stroke rate and in-hospital and overall mortality. Although the occurrence of type I/III endoleaks remains higher in PGTs, this does not seem to affect reintervention rates. Thus, PGTs should be considered a viable option for treating complex aortic arch pathology, particularly in fragile patients, those with adverse anatomy, or in emergent situations. Large-volume prospective studies directly comparing these two techniques are currently warranted.
Downloads
References
Czerny M, Schmidli J, Adler S, van den Berg JC, Bertoglio L, Carrel T, et al. Current options and recommendations for the treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies involving the aortic arch: an expert consensus document of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic surgery (EACTS) and the European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2019;55:133-62.
Brown JA, Arnaoutakis GJ, Szeto WY, Serna-Gallegos D, Sultan I. Endovascular repair of the aortic arch: State of the art. J Card Surg. 2021;36:4292-300.
Ahmad W, Wegner M, Dorweiler B. Meta-analysis and meta-regression of the total endovascular aortic repair in aortic arch. Vasa. 2023;52:175-85.
Zhu L, Li X, Lu Q. A systematic review and meta-analysis of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with the proximal landing zone 0. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10:1034354.
Li Y, Hu Z, Wang J, Zhang Y, Chen Z, Zhang H. Endovascular Chimney Technique for Aortic Arch Pathologies Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;47:305-15.
Kwiecinski J, Cheng CP, Uberoi R, Hadi M, Hempel P, Degel C, You Z. Thoracic aortic parallel stent-graft behaviour when subjected to radial loading. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;118:104407.
Spath P, Campana F, Tsilimparis N, Gallitto E, Pini R, Faggioli G, et al. Outcomes of Fenestrated and Branched Endografts for Partial and Total Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2024;67:106-16.
Voskresensky I, Scali ST, Feezor RJ, Fatima J, Giles KA, Tricariro R, et al. Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair using aortic arch chimney stents in high-risk patients. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:9-20.
Wang T, Shu C, Li QM, Li M, Li X, He H, et al. First experience with the double chimney technique in the treatment of aortic arch disease. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:1018-27.
Shahverdyan R, Mylonas S, Gawenda M, Brunkwall J. Single-center mid-term experience with chimney-graft technique for the preservation of flow to the supra-aortic branches. Vascular. 2018;26:175-82.
Wang L, Huang Y, Guo D, Xu X, Chen B, Jiang J, et al. Application of triple-chimney technique using C-TAG and Viabahn or Excluder iliac extension in TEVAR treatment of aortic arch dilation diseases. J Thorac Dis. 2018;10:3783-90.
Kanaoka Y, Ohki T, Maeda K, Shukuazawa K, Baba T, Tezuka M, et al. Outcomes of Chimney Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for an Aortic Arch Aneurysm. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;66:212-9.
Teymouri M, Mehta M, Paty P, Jayakumar L, Kostun ZW. Complete zone 0-10 aortic endovascular reconstruction. J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech. 2023;9:101111.
Gao F, Zeng Q, Lin F, Ge X. Sandwich Technique for Endovascular Repair of Acute Type A Aortic Dissection. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24:647-53.
Olivas-Flores R, Llamas-Macias FJ, Nuño-Escobar C, Calderón-Llamas MA, Landin-Alcaraz A, Cota-Gallegos I, et al. Reparación endovascular de aorta torácica con técnica de doble chimenea: una alternativa a la cirugía de arco aórtico posterior a la realización de Bentall-Bono en la disección aórtica tipo A. Rev Mex Angiol. 2019;47:36-42.
Guo B, Guo D, Chen B, Shi Z, Dong Z, Yan C, et al. Endovascular Outcomes in Aortic Arch Repair with Double and Triple Parallel Stent Grafts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:1984-92.
Bosiers MJ, Donas KP, Mangialardi N, Torsello G, Riambau V, Criado FJ, et al. European Multicenter Registry for the Performance of the Chimney/Snorkel Technique in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologic Conditions. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016;101:2224-30.
Pecoraro F, Lachat M, Cayne NS, Pakeliani D, Rancic Z, Puippe G, et al. Midterm Results of Chimney and Periscope Grafts in Supra-aortic Branches in High Risk Patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:295-302.
Bao X, Zhao Y, Li T, Wu M, Zeng Z, Gao M, et al. Chimney Graft Technique Combined With Embolization for Treating Ruptured Aortic Arch Lesions. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021;8:711283.
Zhao Y, Feng J, Yan X, Zhu G, Zhou J, Li Z, et al. Outcomes of the Chimney Technique for Endovascular Repair of Aortic Dissection Involving the Arch Branches. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;58:238-47.
Ahmad W, Liakopoulos OJ, Mylonas S, Wegner M, Brunkwall J, Dorweiler B. Long-Term Outcomes after Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair Using Chimney Grafts for Aortic Arch Pathologies: 10 Years of Single-Center Experience. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;72:400-8.
Kurimoto Y, Maruyama R, Ujihira K, Nishioka N, Hasegawa K, Iba Y, et al. Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair for Challenging Aortic Arch Diseases Using Fenestrated Stent Grafts From Zone 0. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100:24-32.
Spear R, Haulon S, Ohki T, Tsilimparis N, Kanaoka Y, Milne CP, et al. Editor's Choice - Subsequent Results for Arch Aneurysm Repair with Inner Branched Endografts. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;51:380-5.
Tazaki J, Inoue K, Higami H, Higashitani N, Toma M, Saito N, et al. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair with branched Inoue Stent Graft for arch aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:1340-8.
Spear R, Hertaul A, Van Calster K, Settembre N, Delloye M, Azzaoui R, et al. Complex endovascular repair of postdissection arch and thoracoabdominal aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:685-93.
Law Y, Kölbel T, Detter C, Rohlffs F, von Kodolitsch Y, Makaloski V, et al. Emergency Use of Branched Thoracic Endovascular Repair in the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2019;107:1799-806.
Tsilimparis N, Detter C, Law Y, Rohlffs F, Heidemann F, Brickwedel J, et al. Single-center experience with an inner branched arch endograft. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:977-85.
Ferrer C, Cao P, Coscarella C, Ferri M, Lovato L, Campanini S, et al. Italian Registry of double inner branch stent graft for arch Pat-Hology (the TRIUmPH Registry). J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:672-82.
Verscheure D, Haulon S, Tsilimparis N, Resch T, Wanhainen A, Mani K, et al. Endovascular Treatment of Post Type A Chronic Aortic Arch Dissection With a Branched Endograft: Early Results From a Retrospective International Multicenter Study. Ann Surg. 2021;273:997-1003.
Weijde E, Heijmen RH, van Schaik PM, Hazenberg CEVB, van Herwaarden JA. Total Endovascular Repair of the Aortic Arch: Initial Experience in the Netherlands. Ann Thorac Surg. 2020;109:1858-63.
Tsilimparis N, Law Y, Rohlffs F, Spanos K, Debus ES, Kölbel T. Fenestrated endovascular repair for diseases involving the aortic arch. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71:1464-71.
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Kölbel T, Dias NV, Sonesson B, Karelis A, et al. Multicenter global early feasibility study to evaluate total endovascular arch repair using three-vessel inner branch stent-grafts for aneurysms and dissections. J Vasc Surg. 2021;74:1055-65.
Czerny M, Berger T, Kondov S, Siepe M, Saint Lebes B, Mokrane F, et al. Results of endovascular aortic arch repair using the Relay Branch system. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2021;60:662-8.
Li X, Zhang L, Song C, Zhang H, Xia S, Li H, et al. Long-Term Outcomes of Thoracic Endovascular Repair for Aortic Arch Dissection Using Customized Single-Branched Fenestrated Stent-Graft. Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2021;55:577-85.
Hauck SR, Kupferthaler A, Kern M, Rousseau H, Ferrer C, Iwakoshi S, et al. Branched versus fenestrated thoracic endovascular aortic repair in the aortic arch: A multicenter comparison. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;164:1379-89.
Lee KB, Porras-Colon J, Scott CK, Chamseddin K, Baig MS, Timaran CH. Early Results and Feasibility of Total Endovascular Aortic Arch Repair Using 3-Vessel Company-Manufactured and Physician-Modified Stent-Grafts. J Endovasc Ther. 2024;31:1197-207.
Zhang H, Rong D, Liu F, Ge Y, Wei R, Zhu Y, et al. Case series of total endovascular repair of the aortic arch with a modular inner-branched stent-graft system: first-in-man experience. Br J Surg. 2023;110:1084-6.
Abisi S, Elenmri M, Clough R, Alotaibi M, Gkoutzios P, Modarai B, et al. The Development of Totally Percutaneous Aortic Arch Repair With Inner-Branch Endografts: Experience From 2 Centers. J Endovasc Ther. 2025;32:730-8.
Nana P, Houérou TL, Guihaire J, Gaudin A, Fabre D, Haulon S. Early Outcomes on Triple-Branch Arch Device With Retrograde Left Common Carotid Branch: A Case Series. J Endovasc Ther. 2025;32:802-12.
Becker D, Stana J, Prendes CF, Konstantinou N, Öz T, Pichlmaier M, et al. Endovascular arch repair of anastomotic aneurysms and pseudoaneurysms in patients after open repair of the ascending aorta and aortic arch: a case series. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2023;64:345.
Iglesias Iglesias C, González Canga C, Abril Ramiro F, Alonso Pastor A, Álvarez Marcos F, Alonso Pérez M. An early single-center experience with the Relay double inner-branch arch endograft. J Thorac Dis. 2023;15:6721-9.
Knapsis A, Seker MM, Schelzig H, Wagenhäuser MU. Comparative Evaluation of the Short-Term Outcome of Different Endovascular Aortic Arch Procedures. J Clin Med. 2024;13:4594.
Becker D, Stana J, Prendes C, Ali A, Pichlmaier M, Peters S, et al. The Use of Short Dilator Tip in Endovascular Branched Arch Repair: A Case Series. J Endovasc Ther. 2024;18:1566028241283713.
Fukushima S, Ohki T, Tachihara H, Shukuzawa K, Ohmori M, Ozawa H, et al. Clinical impact of proximal fixation augmentation using the Najuta thoracic fenestrated stent graft during endovascular treatment for distal aortic arch aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2024;80:949-56.
Jubouri M, Surkhi AO, Al-Tawil M, Piffaretti G. Driving Technology for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: An International Analysis of Single-versus Double-Branch RELAY Outcomes. Ann Vasc Surg. 2023 Aug;94:80-91.
